Forensic Accounting

So you think you need a forensic accountant?

You think your spouse is hiding money, or at least is not being fully transparent about it. Maybe they ran the investments, or operate the business, or have always been the keeper of the finances.

Now you are getting a divorce and the numbers do not make sense. Accounts are missing. Business income has suddenly evaporated. Money moved somewhere, and nobody can tell you where.

That is when your attorney says five words: you need a forensic accountant.

There is no secret database

You picture a financial detective with special access. They enter your spouse's Social Security number, press a button, and every hidden bank account, investment account, crypto wallet and suspicious wire lights up on a screen.

Let me lovingly wreck that fantasy before it costs you a fortune. A forensic accountant has no magic database and no special access to financial information. They cannot call a bank and say "I am a forensic accountant, you have to tell me everything John Smith owns, this is for legal proceedings."

Financial institutions do not care whether the caller is Sherlock Holmes, a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, or a CPA.

The authority to obtain private financial records comes from the legal process, not from the title on someone's business card.

Not a magic wand. Not a spreadsheet. Smart storytelling.

Forensic accounting is financial discovery on steroids. Financial discovery is the process of collecting the records needed to understand the full marital estate, and the marital estate is what you are dividing.

You are probably thinking: hold on, we already did financial discovery. We did it twice.

Exactly. And something still is not right. You or your attorney can see that discovery did not bring in everything relevant about the estate. What neither of you can do yet is pinpoint where the problem lives.

If a spouse, a business, a bank or a third party will not produce records, the case stalls. A halted case is frustrating and expensive. But remember what your attorney is actually holding: discovery requests, subpoenas, depositions, motions to compel, court orders. Those are powerful tools, and they only work when someone knows what to ask for.

Why does my attorney not just subpoena everything?

Because legally they cannot. Discovery must be relevant to the case, cannot be unreasonably cumulative, and cannot impose an unjustified burden or expense. Your attorney has to identify the person or institution being subpoenaed, and describe the records sought with enough specificity that the recipient can actually produce them.

That is why the financial work has to come before the subpoena. Following the breadcrumbs gives your attorney a defensible reason to request these records, from this institution, for this period, because this transaction or discrepancy points us there. The attorney has the subpoena power. The financial analysis gives it a proper target.

So your attorney may be holding thousands of pages and still have no practical way, time, or financial training to:

Reconcile transfers between multiple accounts
Notice that three months of statements are missing
Connect a K-1 to an undisclosed business interest
Recognize personal expenses buried in a company general ledger
Follow money from an operating company into a second LLC
Compare reported income with actual deposits and spending
Determine whether sale proceeds ever reached the marital accounts
Know which document would answer the next financial question

Legal work and financial investigation are two different jobs. The financial forensics find the breadcrumbs, identify the gaps and develop the questions. The attorney then uses the authority of the legal process to get the answers.

Three kinds of professional do this work

The search term everyone uses is "forensic accounting," but the work is done by three different professionals at three different price points:

Attorneys who specialize in it, roughly $400 to $500 an hour.
Certified Divorce Financial Analysts, roughly $200 to $300 an hour.
CPAs with dedicated forensic practices who no longer prepare tax returns, roughly $300 to $400 an hour.

Those are industry ranges, not a quote. What an engagement costs depends on what you actually need, which is one of the things a first conversation is for.

How this works in the real world

I cannot speak for every professional in this space. I am a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst. For 18 of my roughly twenty years in the industry I have worked as a financial planner specializing in business owners and complex estates, with a heavy emphasis on tax efficiency. While my peers focused on retirement planning, I was deep inside business financials, helping owners reduce taxes, protect profits and keep more of what they built.

My first forensic case was in 2019. A business owner I worked with told me he suspected his wife had been quietly draining money out of their business. He had raised it with his attorney, who was hard to reach and never pursued it.

I found suspicious journal entries in QuickBooks, transfers to unidentified bank accounts, and cash withdrawals added onto Walmart receipts. The findings made a $120,000 difference for that client.

How I find what is not being shown

1. Gather the financial evidence that exists

I start with what is already available: bank and brokerage statements, tax returns, business records, property records, credit reports, closing documents, emails, and your lived experience. What you remember matters. A comment about cash in a safe, personal expenses run through the business, or money sent to another LLC is often the clue that says where to look.

2. Make the financial story account for itself

I trace transfers, compare documents and reconcile information across accounts and entities. This is where missing statement periods, unfamiliar destinations, inconsistent balances, undisclosed business interests, unexplained cash and income that cannot support the household's spending all start to surface. The gap is rarely obvious in any single document. It becomes visible when the documents are connected to each other.

3. Turn each gap into a question worth asking

"I think my spouse is hiding money" is a concern. It is not yet a usable discovery request. The financial work turns it into questions like:

What account received the $85,000 transferred out of the marital checking account?
How were payments from the operating company to the second LLC recorded on both companies' books?
Who owns the second LLC and the real estate it is developing?
Where were cash receipts recorded before the money went into the safe?
Which personal expenses were paid by the business?
Why does the tax return report income from an entity that does not appear on the marital balance sheet?

4. Identify the records that can answer them

A good financial question points at a specific document: bank statements for a particular account, the general ledger for a defined period, K-1s and business returns, check images, wire details, payroll reports, insurance records, loan applications, ownership documents. I build the list of what is missing, why it matters, who is likely to have it, and what period it needs to cover.

5. Your attorney puts legal force behind the request

This is where their tools become powerful. The attorney converts the financial roadmap into formal discovery, subpoenas the bank or the business, questions your spouse under oath, demands a complete response, or asks the court to compel production. I do not issue the subpoena. I help make sure it is aimed at the right target and asks for the records that can actually answer the question.

6. Analyze what comes back, then follow the next breadcrumb

Financial discovery is rarely finished after one request. A bank statement reveals another account. A general ledger reveals payments to a related company. A loan application identifies an asset nobody disclosed. A K-1 leads to another entity. I analyze what arrives, update the tracing, and wave the flag when a production is incomplete, contradictory, or opens a new line worth pursuing.

The financial professional develops the questions. The attorney gives those questions legal force. The records provide the evidence. Then we follow the evidence wherever it leads.

She already knew the financial story was incomplete

One woman who came to me was an oncology nurse. Her husband owned a couple of businesses. She was not involved in them. They were always treated as his territory.

But over the years she heard things. She heard him talk about running personal expenses through the company. She knew he sometimes parked cash in a safe so it stayed off the books. His brother was covered by the company health insurance without working there, and simply paid cash for his share of the premium. She knew money moved from the primary business into another LLC that was building storage units, and that they showed almost no income from the storage operation in order to reduce taxes. The storage units existed. Value was being built somewhere, whether or not it appeared on the page she was handed.

She knew in her gut that money was sitting in several places. But she had no account numbers, she did not understand how the businesses were structured, and she had spent years feeling she had no business prying into his.

She was told to go get a forensic accountant. But what was that person supposed to do, inspect the safe? Call every bank in town? Ask her husband to kindly explain the money he had worked hard to keep off the books?

She did not need somebody to tell her the numbers looked suspicious. She needed somebody to turn what she already knew into questions that could drive discovery. Where were cash receipts recorded before the cash reached the safe? Which personal expenses were paid by the operating company? Were the brother's insurance reimbursements recorded anywhere? How were transfers to the second LLC characterized on each company's books? Who owned that LLC and the storage real estate? Were the transfers loans, capital contributions, expenses or distributions?

Now there is something useful on the table. Not a general accusation that he hides money, but specific financial leads attached to specific records. That is how a gut feeling becomes a discovery strategy.

Hidden money usually leaves footprints

No professional can guarantee that every concealed dollar will be found. But money tends to leave evidence in places people forget to connect.

An unfamiliar transfer may lead to an undisclosed bank, brokerage or cryptocurrency account.
Interest, dividends, capital gains or a K-1 on a tax return may reveal an asset or entity missing from the financial disclosure.
A mortgage or business loan application may list income and assets that look very different from what is being claimed in the divorce.
A business general ledger may show personal expenses, related-party payments, or money moving into another company.
Public records may reveal real estate, deeds, sales, liens or business ownership.
A lifestyle that substantially exceeds reported income may reveal unreported cash flow, growing debt or asset depletion.
Sale proceeds may leave one known account without ever appearing in another disclosed account.

Each footprint produces a better question. Each answer either explains the discrepancy or tells us the next place to look.

And sometimes nothing was concealed at all. The money is sitting in the open, inside a compensation package or a grant document nobody has read. That is a different problem with a different answer: what gets missed rather than hidden.

I am not just the person with the spreadsheet

I analyze the numbers. But the real value is knowing when they do not tell the whole story, and being willing to wave the flag until the missing pieces are addressed.

I will not quietly type "unknown" into a spreadsheet and move along as though an incomplete financial picture is good enough. I organize what we know, trace what can be traced, identify what does not reconcile, and keep a clear list of what still needs to be produced.

I help turn "I think he has another account" into the transaction showing where to look. "The business pays for everything" into a review of owner benefits and personal expenses. "I know money went into another company" into requests for ownership, bank, tax and intercompany records. "His income cannot possibly be this low" into deposit, cash flow and lifestyle analysis. And "something is missing" into a focused discovery roadmap your attorney can use.

That takes financial skill. It also takes advocacy: asking the next question, calling attention to contradictions, and refusing to let a meaningful gap disappear inside a mountain of paperwork.

I do not promise to discover assets that leave no evidence. I follow the evidence we have, identify the evidence we need, and show what the numbers actually support.

So, do you need a forensic accountant?

Maybe. You may need a forensic CPA when the case requires a formal fraud investigation, a specialized accounting opinion, expert testimony, a complex business reconstruction, or credentials suited specifically to a courtroom assignment.

But hiring one does not remove the need for discovery. It does not make an uncooperative spouse cooperate. And it does not give anyone magical access to private bank records.

Before you spend heavily on a title, these are the questions worth answering:

What do you believe is missing?
What evidence or history points to it?
Which records do you already have?
Which records are missing?
How will those records be legally obtained?
Do you need tracing and settlement analysis, or a formal expert opinion and testimony?
Is the likely financial issue large enough to justify the cost of pursuing it?

"You need a forensic accountant" may be the beginning of the conversation. It is not the strategy. The strategy is knowing what to look for, obtaining the records, following the money, identifying what is still unanswered, and making sure the financial reality does not get ignored.

That is where I come in.

Questions people ask me

Do I need a forensic accountant for my divorce?

Maybe. You may need a forensic CPA when the case calls for a formal fraud investigation, a specialized accounting opinion, expert testimony, a complex business reconstruction, or credentials suited specifically to a courtroom assignment. But hiring one does not remove the need for discovery, it does not make an uncooperative spouse cooperate, and it does not give anyone private access to bank records. Before you spend heavily on the title, it is worth an hour working out what you actually believe is missing and what evidence points to it.

Can a forensic accountant find hidden bank accounts?

Not by looking them up. There is no database. No forensic accountant can call a bank and require it to disclose what someone owns, and financial institutions do not care whether the caller is a CPA, a CDFA or anyone else. The authority to obtain private financial records comes from the legal process, not from a title on a business card. What the financial work does is find the evidence of an account in records you already have, so an attorney can go get it.

What is the difference between a forensic accountant and a CDFA?

Three kinds of professional do forensic financial work in divorce: attorneys who specialize in it, Certified Divorce Financial Analysts, and CPAs with dedicated forensic practices who no longer prepare returns. The work overlaps heavily. The differences are cost, courtroom credentials, and whether you also need the settlement modeled rather than just the money traced. A forensic CPA is built for the expert-opinion and testimony assignment. A CDFA traces the money and then shows you what the resulting settlement does to your actual life.

Why can my attorney not just subpoena everything?

Because discovery has to be relevant, cannot be unreasonably cumulative, and cannot impose an unjustified burden. Your attorney has to identify the institution and describe the records with enough specificity for that recipient to produce them. That is why the financial work comes before the subpoena. Following the breadcrumbs gives the attorney a defensible reason to request specific records, from a specific institution, for a specific period, because a particular transaction or discrepancy points there.

Can you make my spouse turn over records?

No, and neither can a forensic accountant. Compelling disclosure is a legal power and it belongs to an attorney and the court. I do not issue the subpoena. I help make sure the subpoena is aimed at the right target and asks for the records that can actually answer the question.

We already did discovery twice and it still does not add up. Now what?

That is usually the point at which this work starts. It means the process collected documents without answering the question, and that neither you nor your attorney can yet pinpoint where the problem lives. A pile of records is not an answer. The next step is reconciling what you have against itself until the gaps become specific enough to ask about.

“But you’re not in my state.”

Correct. The law is. The financial work is not.

Two thirds of a divorce is about money. Not just cash. The house, the IRA, the car, the pension. All of it gets called an asset, and none of it behaves the same way once it is split. What it costs to carry. How fast you could turn it back into money. What it does to you five years out. Same value on paper, completely different life.

That does not change at a state line. Dividing is what the legal process does. It does not model the result.

And it moves fast. In Spokane, where I practice, a contested family law hearing is scheduled for thirty minutes. Ten minutes a side, ten for the decision. Criminal trials take precedence over civil by rule, so the calendar does not bend for you. I do not know your county’s number. It is a fair question to put to your attorney, or to look up in your county’s local rules.

Whatever your financial argument is, it either arrives already built or it gets made in ten minutes in front of someone running behind.

The part I do happens before that. I cannot force discovery and I cannot conduct it. What I can do is work through what you already have, find what is missing, and turn the feeling that something is off into a specific question with a specific answer.

Do that early and the case usually gets shorter. Arguing about money is what stretches it.

Some of the people I work with have attorneys on both sides. Some are in mediation. Some are sitting down together before anyone is hired. Some are handling it themselves and need the financial side to hold up in front of a judge. I work in all four.

If you are not certain the financial side is getting the attention it needs, that is the thing to fix. Fixing it does not mean changing anything else.

Not ready to talk yet?

Episode 8 is the compensation package nobody opened, and the six figures sitting inside it.

The Private Sessions is Leanne’s audio series on the money side of divorce. Seventeen episodes on the 401(k), the house, debt, alimony, and the compensation packages nobody reads. Delivered privately to your phone rather than through a podcast app.

Start with 3 free episodes →

No credit card. The first three are free.